Asrock FM2A75 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121018
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 05 '20 at 13:12
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 66
2-Core 96.5
51% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 99.5
8-Core 98.5
13% 99 Pts
64-Core 93.3
6% 93.3 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Palit(1569 1004) 3GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.4% Poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 20.8
Parallax 24.3
20% 23 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 28.8
Splatting 27.8
22% 26.7 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 97 108 89 62 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 410
Write 129
Mixed 129
SusWrite 87.1
41% 189 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 16.1
79% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 47.6
59% 105 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
269GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 65 69 63 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 49.5
Write 44.7
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 62.9
36% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 57%
Toshiba External USB HDD 320GB
245GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 34 36 33 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 32.2
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 32.2
40% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 19%
TrekStor DS pocket light 1TB
790GB free, PID 003a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 28 29 27 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 29.2
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 26.9
39% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 CL11-11-11 D3-1600 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.6% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.9
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75 Pro4 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4 - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $405
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback