Asrock FM2A75 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121018
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMay 05 '20 at 13:09
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 76.1
1-Core 54.1
2-Core 85.7
47% 72 Pts
4-Core 87.3
8-Core 70.7
11% 79 Pts
64-Core 70.8
4% 70.8 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Palit(1569 1004) 3GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21% Poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 48
Parallax 56.3
20% 42.9 fps
MRender 22.5
Gravity 28.8
Splatting 31.9
23% 27.7 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 21%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 30 69 74 68 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 385
Write 110
Mixed 118
SusWrite 55.9
36% 167 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 9.9
60% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 76.9
DQ Mixed 44.2
52% 92.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$63
269GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 22 55 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 43.8
Write 48.7
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 44.9
31% 42.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 57%
Toshiba External USB HDD 320GB
245GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 15 31 35 36 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 29.5
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 26.8
35% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 19%
TrekStor DS pocket light 1TB
790GB free, PID 003a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 13 26 28 30 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 18.2
Write 20.5
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 22.4
28% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 CL11-11-11 D3-1600 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
20.5% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 7
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75 Pro4 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4 - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $405
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback