Asrock FM2A75 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121018
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '20 at 16:50
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 47.2
2-Core 57.2
43% 60.8 Pts
4-Core 67.3
8-Core 72
9% 69.7 Pts
64-Core 74.3
5% 74.3 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Palit(1569 1004) 3GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.5% Below average
Lighting 47.7
Reflection 48.3
Parallax 64.6
39% 53.5 fps
MRender 32.4
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 29.7
26% 32 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 31 67 78 76 68 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.1% Poor
Read 176
Write 91.3
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 55.9
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 8.9
36% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 91.1
DQ Mixed 48.4
58% 102 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
269GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 23 40 51 52 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 75.5
Write 70.3
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 38
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 57%
TrekStor DS pocket light 1TB
724GB free, PID 003a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 15 24 28 28 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 26.5
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 21.7
34% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 CL11-11-11 D3-1600 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
22.3% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 7.3
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75 Pro4 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4 - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback