Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H110M-A/M.2  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190228
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJun 23 '20 at 20:42
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 200
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 356
47% 352 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 85CC) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.3% Poor
Lighting 29.2
Reflection 25
Parallax 27.8
24% 27.3 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 30.8
Splatting 27.6
25% 31.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320311CS 320GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ES12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.5 8.7 16 8.4 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.48% Terrible
Read 4.2
Write 5.3
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 11.3
5% 6.38 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
25% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 4.48%
Great: 50%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
517GB free
Firmware: 1805
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 88 86 85 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 81
Write 54.8
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 87.5
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.4% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 15.8
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback