Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H270-HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJun 12 '20 at 00:07
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 200
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 389
51% 382 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.10.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.1% Above average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 80
53% 70.9 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 56.8
51% 62.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 93 44 63 61 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
42% Average
Read 434
Write 349
Mixed 298
SusWrite 84
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 5.4
54% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 77.4
DQ Mixed 32.9
42% 74.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.3% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 10.6
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,023 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback