HP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3398
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180212
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJun 09 '20 at 03:15
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 199
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 444
50% 390 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 3398) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
AMD Radeon HD 7650A Graphics
MSI(1462 2681) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1007
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.97% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 6.35
Parallax 5.38
5% 6.07 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 4.87
Splatting 5.43
4% 5.26 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,274
Write 4,787
Mixed 4,914
1,114% 4,992 MB/s
4K Read 362
4K Write 215
4K Mixed 249
981% 275 MB/s
DQ Read 844
DQ Write 551
DQ Mixed 679
511% 691 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Liteonit LMS-32L6M-HP 32GB
4GB free
Firmware: DM51707
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 252
Write 82.8
Mixed 113
32% 149 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 23.5
87% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 81.5
DQ Mixed 92.2
77% 114 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 59%
ASMT 2105 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 51d6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 160 161 161 160 159 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 159
Write 148
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 160
187% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
V01L3SF8GB52852816 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 USDT Builds (Compare 542 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback