To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120703
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 02 '20 at 07:41
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 179
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 351
47% 350 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 76%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
35.5% Below average
Lighting 42.3
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 51.7
34% 44.4 fps
MRender 54.9
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 36.7
38% 47.2 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 135 133 140 133 137 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51% Above average
Read 233
Write 181
Mixed 189
SusWrite 134
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 23.9
83% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 152
121% 169 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 51%
Great: 88%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145
37GB free
Firmware: SC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 116 127 150 136 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 154
Write 152
Mixed 62
SusWrite 131
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
584GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 84 96 97 99 100 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
373GB free
Firmware: 2BC10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 96 96 96 97 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 55.5
Write 53.2
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 95.2
46% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$222
6TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 207 216 215 218 218 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Hitachi HDT725050VLA360 500GB-$159
60GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 39
Write 45
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 44.2
29% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24%
Great: 40%
WDC WD20 EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
39GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 25.2
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 14.9
31% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12%
Great: 19%
ST2000VX 000-1CU164 2TB
168GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.6% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 25.5
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 15.3
31% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 11%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 25
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 27.3
36% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 21%
Patriot Memory 16GB
3GB free, PID 3800
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 6.9 10 10 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
7.4% Terrible
Read 28.7
Write 9.2
Mixed 8
SusWrite 8.9
15% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.4%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.6% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback