HP CQ1100NL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP CQ1100NL  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ACA
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111028
Uptime13.1 Days
Run DateMar 10 '21 at 21:20
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 86%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Memory 48.2
1-Core 15.7
2-Core 22.4
22% 28.8 Pts
4-Core 25.6
8-Core 29.5
4% 27.5 Pts
64-Core 34.4
2% 34.4 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
HP(103C 2ACA) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.98% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.98%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT725050VLA360 500GB-$159
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V56OA7BA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 21 25 16 29 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 38.7
Mixed 17
SusWrite 24.7
20% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 40%
USB FLASH DRIVE 1GB
0GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7.7
Write 8
Mixed 7.3
10% 7.67 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 4.9
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 3.8
8% 2.67 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback