Lenovo 3209C21

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 3209C21  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 14:10
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 192
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 372
49% 368 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Asus(1043 046A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1260 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.2% Poor
Lighting 9
Reflection 42.8
Parallax 97.6
7% 49.8 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 69
Splatting 82.5
60% 71.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 248 59 55 75 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 484
Write 416
Mixed 410
SusWrite 138
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 25.1
110% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 48.2
102% 205 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 92%
Verbatim STORE N GO 2GB
2GB free, PID 0304
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Read 12
Write 4
Mixed 6
SusWrite 5.2
8% 6.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 6%
Verbatim MICRO PLUS 8GB
7GB free, PID 0224
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 7 7 7.1 6.4 7.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
8.37% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 6.5
11% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
76% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.37%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD32G133381 8502 PSD32G133381 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback