Lenovo 3209C21

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 3209C21  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '20 at 06:26
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 191
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 365
48% 361 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Asus(1043 046A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1260 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 5
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 97.6
4% 43.1 fps
MRender 9.71
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 81.5
32% 32.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 103 112 114 60 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 475
Write 412
Mixed 403
SusWrite 140
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 24.5
98% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 0.5
78% 186 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 92%
Verbatim STORE N GO 2GB
2GB free, PID 0304
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.2 5.3 5.1 5.3 5.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Read 13
Write 5.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 5.2
8% 7.15 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD32G133381 8502 PSD32G133381 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback