Lenovo 3209C21

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 3209C21  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181211
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 04:12
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 188
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 367
49% 366 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Asus(1043 046A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1260 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.9% Good
Lighting 76.8
Reflection 3.38
Parallax 44.6
63% 41.6 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 69.1
Splatting 84.2
60% 72.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 82 94 75 75 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 480
Write 424
Mixed 408
SusWrite 120
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 24.9
100% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 0.5
79% 189 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 92%
Verbatim STORE N GO 2GB
2GB free, PID 0304
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Read 12
Write 4
Mixed 6
SusWrite 5.2
8% 6.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 6%
Verbatim MICRO PLUS 8GB
7GB free, PID 0224
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 6.8 7 7 6.6 7.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
8.35% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 5
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 6.5
11% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
75% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.35%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD32G133381 8502 PSD32G133381 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.5
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback