Notebook P65xHP

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	345% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Notebook P65xHP (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook P65xHP
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180301
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 10 '20 at 02:33
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Memory 91.8 1-Core 105 2-Core 197 77% 131 Pts	4-Core 423 8-Core 593 64% 508 Pts	64-Core 590 36% 590 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Clevo(1558 65A4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	52% Above average	Lighting 61.9 Reflection 73 Parallax 60.2 50% 65.1 fps	MRender 69.5 Gravity 61.8 Splatting 68.9 55% 66.7 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 649GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1657 1744 1763 1543 1534 1556 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	345% Outstanding	Read 2,449 Write 2,191 Mixed 1,514 SusWrite 1,633 436% 1,947 MB/s	4K Read 64.8 4K Write 180 4K Mixed 93.3 313% 113 MB/s	DQ Read 1,198 DQ Write 1,064 DQ Mixed 1,105 836% 1,122 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 345% Great: 410%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 484GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 105 103 105 106 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 73.3 Write 80.7 Mixed 51.2 SusWrite 104 57% 77.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.6 192% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 71%
VendorCo ProductCode 134GB 584 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 125GB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	7.57% Terrible	Read 22.5 Write 16.5 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 16.3 19% 15.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 7.57% Great: 11%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB 672 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 15GB free, PID 0749 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 89.2 Write 21.7 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 20.7 44% 40.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 3.7 249% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 32%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 25GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 132 Write 96.5 Mixed 93.2 131% 107 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 4.1 281% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 22 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 28.3 SC Mixed 23.6 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 64.5 62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P65xHP Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

System: Notebook P65xHP

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	126x
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	90x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	37x

SSD
MX300 SATA M.2 525GBCrucial $140Bench 85%, 20,154 samples	10x
MX300 SATA M.2 275GBCrucial $42Bench 80%, 16,792 samples	8x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	6x

RAM
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,974 samples	18x
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,275 samples	14x
GKE800SO102408-2400 2x8GBHynixBench 71%, 801 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $140

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16