Notebook P870TM_TM1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNotebook P870TM_TM1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P870TM_TM1
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '20 at 17:26
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 141
2-Core 280
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 882
88% 714 Pts
64-Core 1,119
69% 1,119 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 087A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 140
Parallax 121
109% 132 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 132
Splatting 106
94% 117 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
203GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1337 316 313 314 317 316 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2,059
Write 1378
Mixed 522
SusWrite 485
245% 1,111 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 59.6
238% 92 MB/s
DQ Read 1,155
DQ Write 1,161
DQ Mixed 736
669% 1,017 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 236%
Great: 236%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1197 342 343 344 341 344 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 2508
Write 1464
Mixed 869
SusWrite 485
293% 1,332 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 74.7
270% 97.6 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 988
DQ Mixed 999
746% 986 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 257%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
871GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 483 481 488 488 488 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 485
Mixed 456
SusWrite 481
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 60.4
203% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Sandisk SD8SN8U256G1122 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: X4162000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 174 170 173 162 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 478
Mixed 356
SusWrite 187
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 49.8
177% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 239
201% 293 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 98%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
696GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 127 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 129
Write 132
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 124
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2400 C15 Series 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
79.1% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 25.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 26.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P870TM_TM1 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

System: Notebook P870TM_TM1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $287
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback