Notebook P870TM_TM1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNotebook P870TM_TM1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P870TM_TM1
Memory59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 28 '19 at 19:29
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$443
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 84
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 918
87% 722 Pts
64-Core 1,135
70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 087A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 142
Parallax 134
111% 138 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 132
Splatting 105
94% 116 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
191GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1344 317 317 316 316 315 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,909
Write 1382
Mixed 495
SusWrite 488
236% 1,068 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 55
230% 89.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,055
DQ Write 1,142
DQ Mixed 836
701% 1,011 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 225%
Great: 236%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1359 321 319 320 320 320 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 2,500
Write 1,465
Mixed 901
SusWrite 493
295% 1,340 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 80.2
277% 99.7 MB/s
DQ Read 966
DQ Write 1,012
DQ Mixed 992
745% 990 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 260%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
874GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 485 484 492 493 492 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 488
Mixed 463
SusWrite 485
110% 488 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 63.3
212% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 355
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Sandisk SD8SN8U256G1122 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: X4162000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 173 170 170 166 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 464
Mixed 325
SusWrite 191
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 49.5
173% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 239
197% 281 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 98%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
618GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 114 115 122 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 118
Write 128
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 118
70% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2400 C15 Series 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 25.4
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 26.1
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P870TM_TM1 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

System: Notebook P870TM_TM1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback