Notebook P870TM_TM1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNotebook P870TM_TM1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P870TM_TM1
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 19 '20 at 05:31
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$443
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 299
91% 169 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 974
96% 786 Pts
64-Core 1,237
76% 1,237 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 087A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.4% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 46.2
Parallax 37.5
33% 41.2 fps
MRender 57.1
Gravity 40
Splatting 52.2
41% 49.8 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
203GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1200 407 312 313 314 313 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,930
Write 1,189
Mixed 469
SusWrite 477
224% 1,016 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 64.6
248% 96.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,099
DQ Write 1,132
DQ Mixed 735
657% 989 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 232%
Great: 236%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1361 319 321 320 320 319 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,502
Write 1,470
Mixed 869
SusWrite 493
294% 1,334 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 82.1
281% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 1,067
DQ Mixed 1,016
766% 1,019 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 263%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
871GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 485 484 491 490 492 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 481
Mixed 460
SusWrite 486
110% 486 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 63.3
212% 76 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 355
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
Sandisk SD8SN8U256G1122 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: X4162000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 182 173 167 167 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 479
Mixed 355
SusWrite 191
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 50.7
179% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 238
202% 296 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 102%
Great: 98%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
697GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 107 111 128 127 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 124
Write 124
Mixed 26
SusWrite 114
70% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2400 C15 Series 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 25.4
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 26.6
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P870TM_TM1 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

System: Notebook P870TM_TM1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback