Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	MSI MS-7A63
Motherboard	MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170627
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 20 '20 at 10:11
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Memory 94.9 1-Core 140 2-Core 226 89% 154 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 389 52% 389 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 8554) CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Lighting 37.1 Reflection 35 Parallax 31.8 30% 34.6 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 33.2 Splatting 33.5 28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 291 298 299 299 298 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 461 Write 443 Mixed 377 SusWrite 306 89% 397 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 62 204% 75.2 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 362 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 124%
Kingdian S200 60GB 737 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 55GB free Firmware: Q1103A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 263 268 277 277 277 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Read 467 Write 274 Mixed 313 SusWrite 266 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 17.3 126% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 266 DQ Mixed 26.5 71% 146 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ABA200 2TB 2,995 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: MZ4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 130 131 126 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Read 149 Write 146 Mixed 30 SusWrite 129 82% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.4 112% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 1x8GB-$25 15,315 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.3 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 16.8 48% 17 GB/s	Latency 57.3 70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	275x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	246x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	160x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	525x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	216x
Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $192Bench 83%, 40,358 samples	133x

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $750

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16