Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	MSI MS-7A63
Motherboard	MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170627
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '20 at 07:19
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 95.6 1-Core 140 2-Core 214 88% 150 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 389 52% 390 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 8554) CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Lighting 37.2 Reflection 35.3 Parallax 31.8 30% 34.8 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 33.3 Splatting 33.5 28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 295 297 298 298 287 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 492 Mixed 402 SusWrite 307 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 49 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 65.6 222% 78.5 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 361 271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 124%
Kingdian S200 60GB 737 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 55GB free Firmware: Q1103A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 276 281 282 282 280 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Read 514 Write 282 Mixed 327 SusWrite 274 78% 349 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 22.2 143% 58.2 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 272 DQ Mixed 26.1 72% 148 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ABA200 2TB 2,995 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: MZ4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 130 130 131 130 106 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 116 Write 125 Mixed 27 SusWrite 126 71% 98.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 117% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 1x8GB-$25 15,315 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 15.5 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 17.1 50% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 55.3 72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	272x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	244x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	159x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	520x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	215x
Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $192Bench 83%, 40,358 samples	132x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $968

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16