Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	MSI MS-7A63
Motherboard	MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170627
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '20 at 21:07
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Memory 95.5 1-Core 140 2-Core 220 88% 152 Pts	4-Core 385 8-Core 387 52% 386 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 8554) CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Lighting 37.1 Reflection 35.3 Parallax 35.6 30% 36 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 33.3 Splatting 33.5 28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 286 279 265 255 248 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 492 Mixed 392 SusWrite 284 94% 419 MB/s	4K Read 49.1 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 66.6 225% 79.6 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 361 271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 124%
Kingdian S200 60GB 737 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 55GB free Firmware: Q1103A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 275 276 280 280 280 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Read 509 Write 274 Mixed 334 SusWrite 274 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 22.1 144% 59 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 269 DQ Mixed 26.3 71% 148 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ABA200 2TB 2,995 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: MZ4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 127 128 126 127 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 148 Write 150 Mixed 29 SusWrite 126 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.4 112% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 1x8GB-$25 15,315 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 16.4 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 21.3 SC Mixed 17.9 53% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 55.7 72% 55.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	272x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	244x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	159x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	520x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	215x
Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $192Bench 83%, 40,358 samples	132x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $948

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16