Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	MSI MS-7A63
Motherboard	MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170627
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '20 at 08:41
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Memory 95 1-Core 139 2-Core 213 87% 149 Pts	4-Core 383 8-Core 389 52% 386 Pts	64-Core 386 24% 386 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 8554) CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Lighting 37.2 Reflection 35.3 Parallax 31.8 30% 34.8 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 33.3 Splatting 33.5 28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 294 298 298 296 288 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 492 Mixed 427 SusWrite 306 97% 434 MB/s	4K Read 48.4 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 66.7 224% 79.5 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 361 271% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 124%
Kingdian S200 60GB 737 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 55GB free Firmware: Q1103A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 281 286 286 286 287 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Read 515 Write 280 Mixed 332 SusWrite 279 78% 351 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 22.5 145% 59.4 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 27 73% 151 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ABA200 2TB 2,995 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: MZ4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 128 130 131 125 130 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	70% Good	Read 116 Write 115 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 128 69% 96 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.4 110% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 1x8GB-$25 15,315 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 15.7 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 17.1 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 57 70% 57 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	272x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	244x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	159x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	520x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	215x
Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $192Bench 83%, 40,358 samples	132x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $960

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16