HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8054
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191225
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 17 '20 at 15:31
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 82
1-Core 119
2-Core 234
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 622
66% 526 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8054) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.06% Terrible
Lighting 7.37
Reflection 9.92
Parallax 7.91
6% 8.4 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 14.4
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.06%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1300_MTFDDAK256TDL 256GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M5MU000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 198 204 191 198 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 462
Write 277
Mixed 296
SusWrite 210
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 38.7
130% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 256
199% 272 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 98%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
954GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 126 128 128 127 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 114
Write 136
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 128
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 72%
WDC WD15 EADS-00P8B0 1.5TB
885GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 1.1 0.1 0.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 81.5
Write 82
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 0.6
70% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
57% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 32%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 99 94 96 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 82.7
Write 43
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 95.7
89% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 40%
WDC WD15 EADS-00P8B0 1.5TB
614GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.6 0 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 74.2
Write 72
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 0.4
64% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 32%
ST2000DL 004 HD204UI 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 99 94 96 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 130
Write 62.7
Mixed 61
SusWrite 95.5
110% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
121% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 48%
ASMT 2105 320GB
274GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 26
Write 50
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 56.4
58% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF - [0x9B85] CT4G4DFS8213.C8FHP Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB - [0x9B85] CT4G4DFS8213.C8FHP 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.7% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 22
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 21.9
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 3,009 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback