Asus Maximus IV Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV Extreme  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '20 at 18:59
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 101
2-Core 202
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 510
50% 407 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 19.7
17% 19.3 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 16.6
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X412
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 216 218 216 214 215 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 432
Write 343
Mixed 298
SusWrite 212
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 33.3
108% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 104
78% 104 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 108%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
836GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1188 854 825 831 835 834 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,168
Write 1,206
Mixed 1,125
SusWrite 895
248% 1,098 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 57.8
196% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 757
DQ Write 499
DQ Mixed 661
484% 639 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 190%
Great: 276%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
1TB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 390 391 388 387 390 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 466
Mixed 402
SusWrite 384
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 41.1
135% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 364
275% 369 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 101%
Great: 122%
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
173GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 213 214 211 211 213 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 437
Write 342
Mixed 352
SusWrite 210
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 37.1
117% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 101
77% 103 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 119%
SanDisk X110 SATA M.2 256GB
236GB free
Firmware: X231
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 139 142 143 139 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 340
Write 132
Mixed 143
SusWrite 141
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 23.2
82% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 49.8
DQ Write 47.2
DQ Mixed 102
62% 66.4 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 95%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
382GB free
Firmware: 01.01S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 124 124 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 136
Write 121
Mixed 102
SusWrite 124
90% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 76%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
451GB free
Firmware: 01.01S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 131 131 130 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 133
Write 119
Mixed 111
SusWrite 130
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 991987 (996987) Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 991987 (996987) Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus IV Extreme Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $590
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback