Asus Maximus IV Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV Extreme  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110328
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 13 '20 at 23:20
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 511
51% 415 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 19.7
18% 19.3 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 16.6
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 355 352 353 353 353 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 470
Write 410
Mixed 390
SusWrite 348
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 38.1
126% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 186
142% 193 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 125%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
836GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1226 842 815 830 832 834 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,209
Write 1,202
Mixed 1,131
SusWrite 896
250% 1,110 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 57.6
196% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 492
DQ Mixed 648
475% 628 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 191%
Great: 276%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
1TB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 359 353 354 353 353 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 465
Mixed 386
SusWrite 349
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 40.7
133% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 366
276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 122%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
446GB free
Firmware: X41200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 413 412 390 312 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 413
Mixed 324
SusWrite 373
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 37.8
127% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 194
148% 201 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 108%
SanDisk X110 SATA M.2 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: X231906
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 69 69 68 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 358
Write 125
Mixed 140
SusWrite 68.5
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 24.2
86% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 104
91% 138 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 95%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
382GB free
Firmware: 01.01S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 65 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 132
Write 112
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 65.3
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
218% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 76%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
451GB free
Firmware: 01.01S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 128 130 131 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 128
Write 121
Mixed 112
SusWrite 130
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 991987 (996987) Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 991987 (996987) Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus IV Extreme Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $590
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback