Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	39.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
Motherboard	Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra (all builds)
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '20 at 03:34
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 96.3 1-Core 160 2-Core 316 104% 190 Pts	4-Core 604 8-Core 1,008 98% 806 Pts	64-Core 1,608 100% 1,608 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Asus(1043 86FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.1% Below average	Lighting 19.3 Reflection 20 Parallax 29.9 16% 23.1 fps	MRender 178 Gravity 114 Splatting 45.6 84% 112 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 295GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 247 382 855 855 905 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Read 551 Write 483 Mixed 320 SusWrite 589 109% 486 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 16.6 58% 20.9 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 198 151% 204 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 340%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3TB free Firmware: 0A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 40 76 80 69 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	31.3% Below average	Read 48 Write 41.2 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 60.6 34% 46.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.4 96% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 46,140 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 37.8 MC Write 39.1 MC Mixed 30.1 102% 35.7 GB/s	SC Read 22 SC Write 41.9 SC Mixed 27.5 87% 30.5 GB/s	Latency 53 76% 53 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 150%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $330

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	3,317x
Core i7-9700KIntel $275Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,248x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	487x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	827x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	624x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	547x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	690x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	604x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	330x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	299x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	263x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	246x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,385

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16