Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 173% UFO	Desktop 108% UFO	Workstation 166% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191218
Uptime	7.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '20 at 01:29
Run Duration	292 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$242 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Memory 96.6 1-Core 159 2-Core 317 104% 191 Pts	4-Core 637 8-Core 1,203 110% 920 Pts	64-Core 1,222 76% 1,222 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3806 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	162% Outstanding	Lighting 226 Reflection 227 Parallax 250 185% 234 fps	MRender 258 Gravity 221 Splatting 142 163% 207 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 162% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 890 587 290 292 291 293 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	243% Outstanding	Read 2146 Write 1,315 Mixed 634 SusWrite 440 250% 1,134 MB/s	4K Read 57 4K Write 202 4K Mixed 58.4 268% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 1,063 DQ Write 1,193 DQ Mixed 750 669% 1,002 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 243% Great: 236%
Sandisk S31024G 1TB 10,952 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 448GB free Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 394 469 476 475 477 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 475 Mixed 386 SusWrite 440 101% 450 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 37.8 171% 65.5 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 279 229% 327 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 121%
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB 87,883 User benchmarks, average bench 197% 332GB free Firmware: S5Z42102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1652 1556 712 577 1110 545 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	262% Outstanding	Read 1,644 Write 1617 Mixed 259 SusWrite 1,025 253% 1,136 MB/s	4K Read 64 4K Write 172 4K Mixed 88.2 301% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 759 DQ Write 1,041 DQ Mixed 350 418% 717 MB/s
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 262% Great: 277%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 177 185 186 182 185 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 148 Mixed 85 SusWrite 181 111% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 114%
SONY WALKMAN 13GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 11GB free, PID 0bbf Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 11 12 12 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 32.8 Write 15.2 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 11.8 26% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 9.8 4K Mixed 8.5 650% 8.57 MB/s	DQ Read 8.6 DQ Write 14 DQ Mixed 9 814% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 53%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB 3,961 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1.5TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 142 151 150 152 151 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 166 Write 85.8 Mixed 106 SusWrite 148 164% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 62% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 71%
SONY WALKMAN 197GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 34GB free, PID 0bbf Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 2.2 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.4% Above average	Read 33 Write 27.2 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 1.6 31% 24 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 14.1 4K Mixed 10.8 878% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 11.1 DQ Write 11 DQ Mixed 13.1 861% 11.7 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 46,140 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 38.8 MC Write 40.7 MC Mixed 32.7 107% 37.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.8 SC Write 42.8 SC Mixed 31.1 87% 30.6 GB/s	Latency 52 77% 52 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $380

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,915x
Core i7-9700KIntel $242Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,626x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $285Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	561x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,321x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	655x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	644x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	869x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	571x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	493x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	289x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	288x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $115Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	255x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,313

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16