Asus M4A79XTD EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A79XTD EVO  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20100617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '22 at 16:20
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 84.1
1-Core 46.7
2-Core 91.2
49% 74 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 258
27% 219 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Lighting 45.4
Reflection 42.1
Parallax 40.3
37% 42.6 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 43.5
Splatting 28.5
29% 36.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 737 317 310 304 301 306 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
568GB free
Firmware: CC3H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 100 101 100 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 88.6
Write 91.3
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 98.5
59% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 66%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
450GB free, PID b206
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 90 91 90 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
34% Below average
Read 63.8
Write 88.2
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 89.1
95% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34%
Great: 45%
SONY WALKMAN 13GB
12GB free, PID 0bbf
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 21
Write 18
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 17.8
26% 19 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 3.3
255% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 53%
SONY WALKMAN 197GB
20GB free, PID 0bbf
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.2 2.8 3.1 2.9 3.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.3% Very poor
Read 22.7
Write 20.6
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 3.2
22% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 3.3
263% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.3% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 12.9
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.9
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A79XTD EVO Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A79XTD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback