Mousecomputer W150HNQ/W170HN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMousecomputer W150HNQ/W170HN  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer W150HNQ/W170HN
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '20 at 18:07
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 80
2-Core 143
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 328
34% 271 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Clevo(1558 5140) 1.2GB
Driver: nvumdshim.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 115 110 109 67 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 429
Write 188
Mixed 316
SusWrite 106
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 15
95% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 76.9
DQ Mixed 83.5
74% 115 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMD-N4G68H1P-13H 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.1% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 8.6
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W150HNQ/W170HN Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Mousecomputer W150HNQ/W170HN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $469
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $288Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback