Mousecomputer W150HNQ/W170HN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMousecomputer W150HNQ/W170HN  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer W150HNQ/W170HN
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '20 at 18:15
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 148
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 347
38% 297 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Clevo(1558 5140) 1.2GB
Driver: nvumdshim.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.84% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.92
Parallax 1.38
2% 2.1 fps
MRender 2.86
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.61 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.84%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 95 141 73 106 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 445
Write 349
Mixed 324
SusWrite 134
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 24.5
91% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 183
164% 245 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMD-N4G68H1P-13H 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W150HNQ/W170HN Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Mousecomputer W150HNQ/W170HN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $469
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback