Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory57.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '20 at 18:39
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 86.3
1-Core 161
2-Core 320
102% 189 Pts
4-Core 631
8-Core 1,209
109% 920 Pts
64-Core 1,749
108% 1,749 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
7.15% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 8.91
6% 9.32 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 7.57
Splatting 16.5
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.15%
Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Nvidia(10DE 12A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3687 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 173
Parallax 182
150% 180 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 155
Splatting 116
123% 155 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 133%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U-512G-1006 512GB
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 284 285 285 283 283 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 469
Mixed 274
SusWrite 289
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 45
159% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 221
187% 276 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 100%
Great: 102%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
402GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2316 823 825 824 825 825 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
355% Outstanding
Read 2,671
Write 2,407
Mixed 2,025
SusWrite 1,073
458% 2,044 MB/s
4K Read 73.9
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 105
362% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,643
DQ Write 1,530
DQ Mixed 1541
1,169% 1,571 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 355%
Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
915GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 152 151 149 154 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 134
Write 94.3
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 151
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W642GU42J5213N8 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2100 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.9% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 20.3
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $380

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,313
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback