Performance Results


Gaming 169% UFO	Desktop 108% UFO	Workstation 170% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190603
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 05 '20 at 01:01
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Memory 97.5 1-Core 156 2-Core 306 103% 187 Pts	4-Core 618 8-Core 1,088 103% 853 Pts	64-Core 1684 104% 1684 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Gigabyte(1458 37BD) CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.50 Performing below potential (70^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	161% Outstanding	Lighting 223 Reflection 235 Parallax 248 182% 236 fps	MRender 260 Gravity 220 Splatting 143 163% 208 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 326GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 786 623 630 629 614 614 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	285% Outstanding	Read 2,574 Write 2,375 Mixed 1,674 SusWrite 649 406% 1,818 MB/s	4K Read 62 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 84.1 278% 97 MB/s	DQ Read 1,367 DQ Write 1,152 DQ Mixed 1,236 932% 1,251 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 285% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$275 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 852GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 490 490 489 490 490 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 488 Mixed 473 SusWrite 490 111% 491 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 57.4 193% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 355 267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 378GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 490 490 490 490 490 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 490 Mixed 404 SusWrite 490 106% 472 MB/s	4K Read 45.9 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 59.2 199% 68.6 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 356 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$38 31,641 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	MC Read 36.3 MC Write 34.7 MC Mixed 25.3 92% 32.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 37.6 SC Mixed 28.8 80% 28 GB/s	Latency 48.4 83% 48.4 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 107%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	208x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	187x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	166x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	152x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	123x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $154Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	110x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	91x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	82x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	80x

Value: 116% - Outstanding

Total price: $898

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16