Performance Results

Gaming 101%
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII IMPACT  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '22 at 23:21
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 241
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 716
65% 549 Pts
64-Core 702
43% 702 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 123E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 217
Parallax 142
123% 170 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 181
Splatting 124
117% 145 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 117%
Great: 140%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 129 139 154 146 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 388
Write 192
Mixed 256
SusWrite 137
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 47
165% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 201
149% 197 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 73%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 443 430 430 435 427 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 439
Mixed 400
SusWrite 436
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 25.4
140% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 34.7
88% 181 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$51
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 33.5
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 44.8
SC Mixed 31.6
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII IMPACT Builds (Compare 344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 72%


EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $502
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback