TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics65.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120705
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 04 '20 at 21:28
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 45.8
2-Core 92.4
47% 72.5 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 179
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 54.8%
 Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
EVGA(3842 1161)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.9% Good
Lighting 87.7
Reflection 77.4
Parallax 66.9
72% 77.3 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 71.1
Splatting 67.6
55% 66.9 fps
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 65.9%
 Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
547GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 691 141 627 0 646 170 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
546GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 119 101 120 107 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 102
Write 91.8
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 106
66% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 59.6%
 Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
437GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 119 101 120 107 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 56.7
Write 106
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 106
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.4
190% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 47.2%
 Great: 90%
WDC WD20EZRX-00D 2TB
293GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 88 81 89 82 87 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 142
Write 138
Mixed 69
SusWrite 84.7
141% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 47.3%
 Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.2% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 11.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 31.2%
 Great: 64%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD  $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples48x
Phenom II X4 965AMD  $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples40x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD  $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples31x
GPU
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples20x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples10x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples13x
Green 240GB (2018)WD  $56Bench 45%, 156,194 samples6x
CS900 120GBPNY  $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples5x
RAM
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 48%, 1,822 samples6x
CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GBUnknownBench 37%, 54 samples6x
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 47%, 2,501 samples5x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback