TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 10094

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10094  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130218
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '20 at 03:28
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 175
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 325
44% 329 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 69.1%
 Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3653) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5100
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.66% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.65
Parallax 1.31
1% 1.56 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 3.35
2% 2.61 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 1.66%
 Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 64GB-$92
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 91 105 101 105 99 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.1% Average
Read 248
Write 103
Mixed 133
SusWrite 100
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 13.2
65% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 85.3
DQ Mixed 29.6
43% 81.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 40.1%
 Great: 65%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$105
931GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 136 134 136 137 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 131
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 136
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 76.3%
 Great: 76%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
22GB free, PID 0722
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 26 26 25 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 24.2
Mixed 25
SusWrite 25.5
35% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3.4
230% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑
This bench: 19.6%
 Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030EB68F9W1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 56.4%
 Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 10094 Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10094

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples29x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples26x
Core i3-3240IntelBench 55%, 37,789 samples25x
GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples53x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples9x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples9x
SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial  $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples7x
256GB SSD 256GBLexarBench 111%, 12,615 samples5x
Burst Elite 240GBPatriotBench 68%, 2,182 samples5x
RAM
1866 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 7,244 samples9x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT425U6AFR6C-PB 6GBHynixBench 42%, 341 samples7x
RMR5030EB68F9W1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 49%, 510 samples6x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback