Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics83.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 09:34
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$161
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 75.7
1-Core 169
2-Core 335
102% 193 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 925
94% 760 Pts
64-Core 1,399
87% 1,399 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.2% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 107
Parallax 98.9
85% 104 fps
MRender 95.2
Gravity 98.9
Splatting 96.1
79% 96.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1273 926 445 346 345 335 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 2,005
Write 2165
Mixed 1,754
SusWrite 612
367% 1,634 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 67.9
234% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,053
DQ Write 637
DQ Mixed 1,199
798% 963 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 228%
Great: 297%
Galax TA1D0120A 120GB
43GB free
Firmware: SBFM10.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 75 75 76 75 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 476
Write 328
Mixed 334
SusWrite 114
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 32.6
138% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 191
176% 269 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 80%
Crucial M4 64GB-$92
25GB free
Firmware: 010G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 102 108 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 502
Write 107
Mixed 148
SusWrite 106
47% 216 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 15.9
104% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 28.5
64% 136 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 65%
Intel 335 Series 180GB-$139
16GB free
Firmware: 335u
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 161 156 145 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 371
Write 209
Mixed 236
SusWrite 150
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 39.5
152% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 217
169% 235 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 88%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
90GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 138 132 133 138 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 148
Write 161
Mixed 80.1
SusWrite 136
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 112%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
128GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 74 76 76 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 65.5
Write 62.6
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 75.2
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.3% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 28.8
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 30
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,676 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback