Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181019
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '20 at 01:25
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 163
2-Core 325
106% 195 Pts
4-Core 649
8-Core 1,277
114% 963 Pts
64-Core 1,289
80% 1,289 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 109%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2652 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 152
Parallax 144
113% 145 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 137
Splatting 115
101% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 590 306 300 300 295 289 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 2,284
Write 1,474
Mixed 1,207
SusWrite 347
294% 1,328 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 80.6
268% 94.2 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 1,485
DQ Mixed 1,000
821% 1,153 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 250%
Great: 280%
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
20GB free
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 86 86 90 91 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 435
Write 293
Mixed 258
SusWrite 85.5
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 13.6
69% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 87
DQ Mixed 43
48% 83.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 55%
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$32
23GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 189 68 68 66 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 461
Write 265
Mixed 313
SusWrite 123
64% 291 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 29.7
134% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 170
151% 224 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 91%
Nvme Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
174GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1187 598 597 597 602 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,301
Write 1,912
Mixed 1,397
SusWrite 697
300% 1,327 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 64
227% 87.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,390
DQ Write 1,636
DQ Mixed 1,301
1,039% 1,443 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 232%
Great: 277%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
352GB free
Firmware: 01.00A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 68 69 68 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 91.5
Write 87.5
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 68.2
58% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
596GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 86 89 87 87 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 89
Write 87.7
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 86.7
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 54%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
126GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 98 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 109
Write 89
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 96.5
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3100 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 31.2
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 30.2
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 53.2
75% 53.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 104%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $309

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $1,091
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback