Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181019
Uptime7 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '20 at 00:06
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 326
98% 184 Pts
4-Core 648
8-Core 1,287
114% 968 Pts
64-Core 1,274
79% 1,274 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 109%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2652 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 152
Parallax 132
114% 141 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 137
Splatting 115
101% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2229
Write 1,474
Mixed 1,203
361% 1,636 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 79.6
266% 93.7 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 1,502
DQ Mixed 1,003
825% 1,159 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
20GB free
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 32 51 44 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 430
Write 185
Mixed 145
SusWrite 42.8
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 11.2
62% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 42.6
DQ Mixed 38.2
39% 65.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 55%
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$32
80GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 196 67 67 68 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
76% Very good
Read 460
Write 258
Mixed 318
SusWrite 123
64% 290 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 28.2
130% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 170
151% 223 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76%
Great: 91%
Nvme Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
219GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1957 642 596 593 597 598 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,223
Write 1,593
Mixed 1,325
SusWrite 830
281% 1,243 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 64.8
220% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,384
DQ Write 1683
DQ Mixed 1,310
1,050% 1459 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 236%
Great: 277%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
352GB free
Firmware: 01.00A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 69 69 70 68 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 90.5
Write 90.5
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 68.3
59% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
596GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 49 64 63 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 87.2
Write 57.8
Mixed 52
SusWrite 45.5
45% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 54%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
126GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 106
Write 102
Mixed 58
SusWrite 98.3
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3100 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 31.3
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 42.8
SC Mixed 29.1
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 53
76% 53 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 104%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $309

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $1,091
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback