Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '19 at 20:18
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 153
2-Core 273
98% 174 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 1,218
108% 915 Pts
64-Core 1,218
75% 1,218 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2652 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 152
Parallax 132
113% 141 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 139
Splatting 115
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 591 329 329 331 326 328 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 2,272
Write 1,473
Mixed 1,167
SusWrite 372
292% 1321 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 79.8
266% 93.6 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 1,484
DQ Mixed 999
821% 1153 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 251%
Great: 280%
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
36GB free
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 97 87 85 87 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 427
Write 280
Mixed 278
SusWrite 97.2
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 18
74% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 82.6
DQ Mixed 42.8
47% 81 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50%
Great: 55%
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$32
81GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 177 66 65 67 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 452
Write 328
Mixed 320
SusWrite 123
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 29.4
136% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 171
154% 230 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 91%
Nvme Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
143GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1935 843 596 597 594 602 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,231
Write 1,545
Mixed 1,338
SusWrite 861
281% 1,244 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 61.7
210% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,388
DQ Write 1,656
DQ Mixed 1,286
1,035% 1,444 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 234%
Great: 277%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
352GB free
Firmware: 01.00A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 92 92 92 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 66.8
Write 68.5
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 92
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
699GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 56 57 74 69 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 91
Write 79.7
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 58.3
52% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 54%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
167GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 105 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 100
Write 106
Mixed 59
SusWrite 104
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3100 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 31.3
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 30.4
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 53.4
75% 53.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 104%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $309

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $1,091
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback