Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '20 at 18:25
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 184
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 264
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 368E) 2GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 450.12
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Lighting 48.9
Reflection 45.5
Parallax 44.7
40% 46.4 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 36.9
32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 123
Write 124
Mixed 70.4
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$32
168GB free
Firmware: JC4B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 103
Write 92.5
Mixed 63.4
64% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
126GB free
Firmware: CC44
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 117
Write 101
Mixed 75.1
73% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
159GB free
Firmware: CC44
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 178
Write 1
Mixed 6
44% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1TB
557GB free, PID 50a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 151 173 173 173 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67% Good
Read 174
Write 105
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 168
173% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 67%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $56

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $293
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback