Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '20 at 18:34
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 182
75% 126 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 274
37% 275 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 368E) 2GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 450.12
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Lighting 48.8
Reflection 45.6
Parallax 44
40% 46.1 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 41.9
Splatting 37
32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 123 117 134 153 156 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 119
Write 126
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 133
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
168GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 107 108 108 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 106
Write 102
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 106
69% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
126GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 121 121 122 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 118
Write 103
Mixed 76
SusWrite 121
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 112%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1TB
557GB free, PID 50a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 168 173 173 173 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 178
Write 166
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 168
199% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback