Lenovo 7052A9G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 7052A9G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1804 x 1014 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '20 at 22:41
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 170
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 293
43% 312 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Nvidia(10DE 098F) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.81% Terrible
Lighting 4.83
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 3.66
4% 4.62 fps
MRender 5.33
Gravity 4.67
Splatting 3.48
4% 4.49 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.81%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 94 89 88 96 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 113
Write 124
Mixed 71
SusWrite 92
73% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.3
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C9-4GAB Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 F3-1600C9-4GAB Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7052A9G Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 7052A9G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback