Seneca PRO648770

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSeneca PRO648770  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z170-A
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170113
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateJan 24 '20 at 01:08
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 74%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 185
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 344
44% 330 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.8% Very good
Lighting 97.2
Reflection 105
Parallax 91.3
79% 98 fps
MRender 90.9
Gravity 89.6
Splatting 93.4
75% 91.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 120GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSF036C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 59 61 62 64 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 474
Write 236
Mixed 234
SusWrite 70
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 41.7
145% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 86.8
102% 178 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
304GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 154 152 152 155 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 178
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 153
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 112%
WD Gold 6TB (2016) -$195
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01M02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 214 212 214 216 217 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 206
Mixed 81
SusWrite 215
127% 174 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
201% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 118%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB-$65
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.8% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 21.5
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 19.1
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback