TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Seneca PRO648770

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSeneca PRO648770  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z170-A
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '19 at 01:09
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 105
2-Core 202
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 389
52% 387 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 77%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.7
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.4% Very good
Lighting 94.1
Reflection 102
Parallax 89.8
77% 95.4 fps
MRender 92.1
Gravity 91.9
Splatting 93.6
76% 92.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 76.4%
 Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 120GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSF036C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 476
Write 385
Mixed 381
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 46.3
150% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 212
174% 247 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
558GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 176 180 179 180 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 177
Mixed 73
SusWrite 179
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 105%
 Great: 112%
WD Gold 6TB (2016) -$195
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01M02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 211 216 217 208 215 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 216
Mixed 87
SusWrite 213
131% 180 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
216% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 120%
 Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB-$65
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.5% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 21.8
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 22.2
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 72.5%
 Great: 104%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback