Asus WS X299 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus WS X299 PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '22 at 14:57
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10980XE-$1,100
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 73.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 268
83% 155 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 972
86% 729 Pts
64-Core 3,060
189% 3,060 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
Sapphire(174B A503) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.4% Very good
Lighting 88.4
Reflection 209
Parallax 131
72% 143 fps
MRender 43.7
Gravity 111
Splatting 113
76% 89 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Force MP300 480GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM11.7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 666
Write 798
Mixed 814
171% 759 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 42.1
151% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 683
DQ Write 522
DQ Mixed 386
348% 530 MB/s
Poor: 87% Great: 165%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$125
23GB free
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 851
Write 555
Mixed 630
150% 678 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 53.4
190% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 506
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 462
364% 501 MB/s
Poor: 95% Great: 144%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$60
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 172 170 180 180 182 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB-$65
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.9% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 15.3
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 11.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS X299 PRO Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 132%
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 166%

Motherboard: Asus WS X299 PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,535
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback