Asus WS X299 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	73.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus WS X299 PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220524
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 21 '22 at 14:57
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10980XE-$1,100 4,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Memory 73.7 1-Core 122 2-Core 268 83% 155 Pts	4-Core 486 8-Core 972 86% 729 Pts	64-Core 3,060 189% 3,060 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Sapphire(174B A503) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.4% Very good	Lighting 88.4 Reflection 209 Parallax 131 72% 143 fps	MRender 43.7 Gravity 111 Splatting 113 76% 89 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 174%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Force MP300 480GB 1,332 User benchmarks, average bench 126% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FM11.7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 666 Write 798 Mixed 814 171% 759 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 42.1 151% 59.3 MB/s	DQ Read 683 DQ Write 522 DQ Mixed 386 348% 530 MB/s
Poor: 87% Great: 165%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119 20,782 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 23GB free Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 851 Write 555 Mixed 630 150% 678 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 147 4K Mixed 53.4 190% 76.5 MB/s	DQ Read 506 DQ Write 534 DQ Mixed 462 364% 501 MB/s
Poor: 95% Great: 144%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 172 170 180 180 182 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB-$60 93,353 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	55.9% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 15.3 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 11.4 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 93.2 43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical WS X299 PRO Builds (Compare 199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 132%

UFO

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 166%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus WS X299 PRO

CPU
Core i9-10980XEIntel $1,100Bench 84%, 4,959 samples	33x
Core i9-7900XIntel $416Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	25x
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 6,322 samples	23x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	20x
RTX 3070Nvidia $425Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	12x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	10x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $80Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	18x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $31Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	10x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $115Bench 342%, 113,801 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 86%, 3,127 samples	4x
HyperX DDR4 3600 C17 4x8GBKingstonBench 104%, 4,320 samples	4x
KHX2666C16/16G Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 Corsair CMK16GX4M1B3000C15 KHX2666C16/16G Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 72GBKingstonBench 79%, 4 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $1,621

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12400F $148	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $360	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $93	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $265	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $357	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16