Seneca PRO648770

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSeneca PRO648770  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z170-A
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '19 at 01:21
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 201
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 399
52% 389 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.6% Very good
Lighting 95.4
Reflection 101
Parallax 90.4
78% 95.7 fps
MRender 91.5
Gravity 90
Splatting 91
74% 90.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 120GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSF036C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 465
Write 320
Mixed 321
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 32.4
133% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 212
159% 214 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
558GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 180 180 180 180 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 184
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 179
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
WD Gold 6TB (2016) -$195
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01M02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 211 215 215 209 216 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 214
Write 216
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 213
132% 182 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.8
232% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 123%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB-$65
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.5% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 21.9
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 20.2
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback