Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4.01GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.01GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Panasonic CF-19THR90QF (all builds)
Motherboard	Panasonic CF19C-4
Memory	0.6 GB free of 4.00781 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100720
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '20 at 11:13
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	56%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 U 540 81 User benchmarks, average bench 32% IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	26% Poor	Memory 40.4 1-Core 32.6 2-Core 46.7 26% 39.9 Pts	4-Core 67.6 8-Core 72.2 9% 69.9 Pts	64-Core 76.6 5% 76.6 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(10F7 8338) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2281 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.46% Terrible	Lighting 0.47 Reflection 0.65 Parallax 0.62 0% 0.58 fps	MRender 0.57 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 1.04 1% 0.69 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.46% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 127 140 88 15 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.6% Poor	Read 106 Write 92.3 Mixed 88.8 SusWrite 105 22% 97.9 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 16.9 4K Mixed 8.8 32% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 12.9 DQ Write 32.9 DQ Mixed 19.7 16% 21.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 44GB 6,316 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 800, 800, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 40960 MB Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 6.4 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 200 20% 200 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16