Panasonic CF-19THR90QF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4.01GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.01GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemPanasonic CF-19THR90QF  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CF19C-4
Memory1.9 GB free of 4.00781 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 11:28
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 U 540
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Memory 56
1-Core 48.2
2-Core 69.6
38% 57.9 Pts
4-Core 80.4
8-Core 82.7
11% 81.6 Pts
64-Core 80.5
5% 80.5 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2281
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.57% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.65
Parallax 0.62
0% 0.63 fps
MRender 0.57
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 1.04
1% 0.86 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.57%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 150 156 148 135 14 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31% Below average
Read 172
Write 148
Mixed 152
SusWrite 127
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 13.1
49% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 40.5
DQ Mixed 19.6
17% 24.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 31%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 44GB
800, 800, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 40960 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 7.1
16% 5.7 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback