Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 19 '20 at 23:22
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$55
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 117
55% 87.5 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 325
37% 288 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
PNY(196E 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.2% Above average
Lighting 75.4
Reflection 78.3
Parallax 68.9
61% 74.2 fps
MRender 78.2
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 47.8
52% 65.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme TS256GMTE220S 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 42B4S8JA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 268 268 269 270 270 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,200
Write 772
Mixed 926
SusWrite 294
178% 798 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 68.9
223% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 529
DQ Write 448
DQ Mixed 466
355% 481 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 158%
Great: 273%
Intenso SATAIII 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 104 74 38 56 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 483
Write 391
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 106
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 22.3
70% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 18.9
DQ Mixed 1.2
28% 73.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 98%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46
172GB free
Firmware: VM10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 58 57 57 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 54
Write 58.8
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 57.4
39% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32%
Great: 32%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46
39GB free
Firmware: VM10
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 48.5
Mixed 37.5
33% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 32%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
421GB free
Firmware: ST6O
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 79.7
Mixed 40.5
45% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 61%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$74
3TB free
Firmware: SC60
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 180
Mixed 86.3
100% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 108%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 158 162 161 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 147
Write 150
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 160
185% 137 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
47% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 991770 Corsair VS2GB1333D4 991770 Corsair VS2GB1333D4 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 12.1
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback