Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJan 07 '20 at 23:07
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$55
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 150
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 313
37% 284 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
PNY(196E 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.6% Above average
Lighting 75.1
Reflection 78.1
Parallax 69.5
61% 74.2 fps
MRender 77.3
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 62.5
57% 70.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme TS256GMTE220S 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 42B4S8JA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 268 269 270 270 270 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,182
Write 828
Mixed 938
SusWrite 289
180% 809 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 68.8
231% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 538
DQ Write 457
DQ Mixed 465
358% 487 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 159%
Great: 273%
Intenso SATAIII 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 144 55 48 50 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 448
Write 382
Mixed 362
SusWrite 106
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 1
88% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 16.5
DQ Mixed 42.1
48% 87.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53%
Great: 98%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46
172GB free
Firmware: VM10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 57 58 57 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 57.2
Write 56.5
Mixed 38
SusWrite 57.4
38% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33%
Great: 32%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46
40GB free
Firmware: VM10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 48.2
Write 54
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 17.8
29% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19%
Great: 32%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
421GB free
Firmware: ST6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 83 84 84 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 87.4
Write 88.9
Mixed 42
SusWrite 83.3
55% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 61%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
3TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 187 185 188 187 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 186
Mixed 88.6
SusWrite 186
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27
30GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 24 26 26 26 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 204
Write 46.7
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 26.3
98% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 10.4
779% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 16.1
DQ Write 19.5
DQ Mixed 12.2
1,138% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 90%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 162 163 165 165 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 123
Write 140
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 162
174% 126 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
46% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 991770 Corsair VS2GB1333D4 991770 Corsair VS2GB1333D4 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.4
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback