Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150626
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '20 at 03:12
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$55 29,222 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 72.6 2-Core 132 58% 94.3 Pts	4-Core 247 8-Core 336 37% 291 Pts	64-Core 332 20% 332 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% PNY(196E 1116) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	59.6% Above average	Lighting 75.2 Reflection 78 Parallax 68.8 61% 74 fps	MRender 76.8 Gravity 70.3 Splatting 62.4 56% 69.8 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme TS256GMTE220S 256GB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 206% 238GB free Firmware: 42B4S8JA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 269 269 269 271 271 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	154% Outstanding	Read 1,080 Write 812 Mixed 934 SusWrite 286 174% 778 MB/s	4K Read 52.7 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 68.3 227% 78.1 MB/s	DQ Read 550 DQ Write 461 DQ Mixed 464 359% 491 MB/s
Poor: 141% ↑ This bench: 154% Great: 273%
Intenso SATAIII 256GB 1,687 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: S022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 133 57 43 74 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 482 Write 389 Mixed 376 SusWrite 106 75% 338 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 12.6 4K Mixed 0.9 44% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 1.1 59% 143 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 98%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46 4,063 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 172GB free Firmware: VM10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 58 57 58 57 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	32% Below average	Read 54 Write 57.3 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 57.4 38% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 32%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46 4,063 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 39GB free Firmware: VM10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 48 Write 54.5 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 19.1 30% 39.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 32%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$69 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 421GB free Firmware: ST6O SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 102 102 100 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 88.2 Write 85.8 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 101 58% 79.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 61%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 187 186 185 188 183 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 209 Write 175 Mixed 87.5 SusWrite 185 120% 164 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 108%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27 3,642 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 30GB free, PID 1000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 24 26 24 26 24 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Read 171 Write 34.7 Mixed 71.3 SusWrite 25.5 81% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 10.1 966% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 16.5 DQ Write 19.8 DQ Mixed 11.9 1,139% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 90%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2.5TB free, PID 0611 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 160 158 162 161 164 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 151 Write 151 Mixed 106 SusWrite 161 193% 142 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 66% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 991770 Corsair VS2GB1333D4 991770 Corsair VS2GB1333D4 12GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	38.9% Below average	MC Read 15 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 13.5 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 8.1 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 82.9 48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	875x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	649x
FX-8320AMD $75Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	441x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	187x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	161x
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	122x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	86x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	85x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	77x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	85x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	56x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	50x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $354

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16