Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150626
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '20 at 01:39
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$55 29,222 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 75.1 2-Core 137 59% 97.1 Pts	4-Core 247 8-Core 335 37% 291 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% PNY(196E 1116) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	59.5% Above average	Lighting 74.9 Reflection 78 Parallax 69.6 61% 74.1 fps	MRender 77.9 Gravity 70.5 Splatting 62.4 57% 70.3 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme TS256GMTE220S 256GB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 206% 238GB free Firmware: 42B4S8JA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 268 268 269 270 270 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	138% Outstanding	Read 1,193 Write 773 Mixed 928 SusWrite 289 177% 796 MB/s	4K Read 50.8 4K Write 67.6 4K Mixed 44.5 170% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 507 DQ Write 446 DQ Mixed 469 354% 474 MB/s
Poor: 141% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 273%
Intenso SATAIII 256GB 1,687 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: S022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 142 56 48 52 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 490 Write 395 Mixed 382 SusWrite 109 77% 344 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 87.3 4K Mixed 1 87% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 16.2 DQ Mixed 42.3 49% 91.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 98%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46 4,063 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 172GB free Firmware: VM10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 57 57 57 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	Read 53.5 Write 60.3 Mixed 39.3 SusWrite 57.2 39% 52.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 32%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46 4,063 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 40GB free Firmware: VM10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 19 19 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 47.7 Write 54.8 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 18.5 29% 39.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 32%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 421GB free Firmware: ST6O SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 101 102 100 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 87.5 Write 86.5 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 101 58% 79.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 61%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$74 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 187 183 188 186 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 172 Mixed 86.5 SusWrite 184 114% 157 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 108%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27 3,642 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 30GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 24 26 26 24 26 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	73% Very good	Read 208 Write 46.8 Mixed 84 SusWrite 26.3 98% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 11.1 4K Mixed 10.1 768% 11.3 MB/s	DQ Read 15.9 DQ Write 19.6 DQ Mixed 12.4 1,147% 16 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 90%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2.5TB free, PID 0611 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 162 162 161 166 164 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Read 123 Write 134 Mixed 87.5 SusWrite 163 175% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 38% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 991770 Corsair VS2GB1333D4 991770 Corsair VS2GB1333D4 12GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.1% Below average	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 12.7 28% 9.67 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 11.8 28% 9.73 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	877x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	649x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	442x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	187x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	161x
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	122x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	86x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	85x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	77x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	85x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	56x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	50x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $358

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48