TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 12 '20 at 16:59
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 909
80% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,206
75% 1,206 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 78.7%
 Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 139F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 148
Parallax 155
118% 149 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 132
Splatting 107
112% 142 fps
Poor: 105% ↑
This bench: 113%
 Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,395
Write 1,473
Mixed 1,271
378% 1,713 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 71.8
237% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 827
DQ Write 579
DQ Mixed 773
558% 726 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA1000CM10002 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 393 240 372 485 484 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 482
Mixed 403
SusWrite 392
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 39.8
141% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 234
210% 318 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 114%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
196GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 288 306 304 303 304 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 484
Mixed 393
SusWrite 309
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 57.6
194% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 357
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 115%
 Great: 124%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
872GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 122 133 135 134 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
61% Good
Read 80.5
Write 128
Mixed 54
SusWrite 131
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
219% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 61%
 Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C16-8GFX F4-2133C15-8GFX F4-2400C16-8GFX F4-2133C15-8GFX 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.7% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 24.9
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 24.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 73.7%
 Great: 100%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD  $235Bench 72%, 30,050 samples97x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD  $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD  $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples59x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples58x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples29x
SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $140Bench 213%, 165,668 samples21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung  $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples17x
RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL  $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples11x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $826
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback